Ancient Yamhad
The History and Legacy of Syria’s First Great Kingdom
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Acheter pour 7,02 $
Aucun mode de paiement valide enregistré.
Nous sommes désolés. Nous ne pouvons vendre ce titre avec ce mode de paiement
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Daniel Houle
-
Auteur(s):
-
Charles River Editors
À propos de cet audio
"There is no king who is mighty by himself. Ten or fifteen kings follow Hammurabi the ruler of Babylon, a like number of Rim-Sin of Larsa, a like number of Ibal-pi-el of Eshnunna, a like number of Amud-pi-el of Qatanum, but twenty follow Yarim-Lim of Yamhad." (A tablet sent to Zimri-Lim of Mari, describing Yarim-Lim I’s authority)
Animal and plant domestication first began during the Neolithic Period around 12,000 BCE in the swath of land known as the Fertile Crescent, which included all of Mesopotamia and then arched in Northern Mesopotamia/Assyria, before covering most of the Levant, which is roughly equivalent with the modern nation-states of Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria. The process from nomadic hunter-gatherer societies to sedentary, agriculture-based societies was gradual, though, and took place over a 2,000-year period. By about 8000 BCE, the first notable cities had formed, although they were more like towns by today’s standards in terms of size. Jericho in the Levant was one of the earliest notable towns, and by 6000 BCE settlements had sprung up across the Fertile Crescent (Haywood 2005, 22).
The creative impetus of organized society in the Fertile Crescent initially came from Southern Mesopotamia, where the Sumerians introduced writing and other hallmarks of civilization to the region just before 3000 BCE, but in less than 1,000 years, things changed dramatically. Mesopotamia experienced the rise and fall of the Sumerian based dynasty in Uruk in the early third millennium BCE, followed by the Akkadian Dynasty in the mid-third millennium, and the Third Dynasty of Ur in the late third millennium. Each of these dynasties claimed hegemony over large parts of Mesopotamia during the apogees of their power, with the Ur III Dynasty even expanding its influence (but not control) into Syria and Persia. However, when these great regional powers collapsed, it created a vacuum in which new city-states would form, grow, and repeat the process. The city-states that were in the middle of Mesopotamia would either reap the benefits of this process by taking land and cities, or they would experience the pitfalls by being conquered or destroyed, but those on the periphery had a unique perspective and experience.
In the late third millennium, the Kingdom of Yamhad, which was located in Northern Syria, sat just outside Mesopotamia but was close enough to play an important role in the geopolitical situation in both regions. Due to archaeological limitations and a lack of primary texts discovered in the primary Yamhad city of Halab, the story of Yamhad has been told primarily through texts from neighboring cities, but the image of Yamhad that emerges is one of a powerful Middle Bronze Age state whose kings were politically shrewd and orientated toward trade and diplomacy over war. Yamhad was strong enough to resist the encroachment of Hammurabi and Babylon, but it eventually succumbed to the powerful and bellicose Hittites. Even still, well after the Kingdom of Yamhad was destroyed, elements of its culture continued to influence the Levant, and particularly Syria, for several centuries.
Ancient Yamhad: The History and Legacy of Syria’s First Great Kingdom chronicles the dramatic rise and fall of the Syrian dynasty and what life was like during Yamhad’s era. You will learn about Yamhad like never before.
©2020 Charles River Editors (P)2020 Charles River Editors