Heaven in Disorder
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Acheter pour 22,26 $
Aucun mode de paiement valide enregistré.
Nous sommes désolés. Nous ne pouvons vendre ce titre avec ce mode de paiement
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Will Tulin
-
Auteur(s):
-
Slavoj Zizek
À propos de cet audio
As we emerge (though perhaps only temporarily) from the pandemic, other crises move center stage: outrageous inequality, climate disaster, desperate refugees, mounting tensions of a new cold war. The abiding motif of our time is relentless chaos.
Acknowledging the possibilities for new beginnings at such moments, Mao Zedong famously proclaimed, "There is great disorder under heaven; the situation is excellent." The contemporary relevance of Mao's observation depends on whether today's catastrophes can be a catalyst for progress or have passed over into something terrible and irretrievable. Perhaps the disorder is no longer under, but in heaven itself. Characteristically rich in paradoxes and reversals that entertain as well as illuminate, Slavoj Žižek's new book treats with equal analytical depth the lessons of Rammstein and Corbyn, Morales and Orwell, Lenin and Christ. It excavates universal truths from local political sites across Palestine and Chile, France and Kurdistan, and beyond.
Heaven in Disorder looks with fervid dispassion at the fracturing of the Left, the empty promises of liberal democracy, and the tepid compromises offered by the powerful. From the ashes of these failures, Žižek asserts the need for international solidarity, economic transformation, and - above all - an urgent, "wartime" communism.
©2021 Slavoj Zizek (P)2022 TantorCe que les auditeurs disent de Heaven in Disorder
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
-
Au global
-
Performance
-
Histoire
- Utilisateur anonyme
- 2022-03-20
well written, but not well argued
Zizek makes bold claims and expands on their implications. He often doesn't try (or bother?) to substantiate those underlying claims. This is fine if you already agree with him. If you don't, then his arguments and his calls for radical change will likely appear naive and reckless.
He appears to lack deep understanding of certain topics, such as covid-19 and the Wall Street Bets affair, yet he argues confidently about the same. His characterisation of the GameStop affair was, at best, overly simplistic and lacking key details. He discusses covid as though it is an existential threat on par with nuclear weapons and ecological disaster. He argues that covid is proof that we need to change our social structures in radical ways, but doesn't really describe why or how.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.