Men Without Work
America's Invisible Crisis
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Men Without Work
Acheter pour 17,81 $
Aucun mode de paiement valide enregistré.
Nous sommes désolés. Nous ne pouvons vendre ce titre avec ce mode de paiement
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Stephen R. Thorne
-
Auteur(s):
-
Nicholas Eberstadt
À propos de cet audio
By one reading, things look pretty good for Americans today: The country is richer than ever before, and the unemployment rate is down by half since the Great Recession.
But a closer look shows that something is going seriously wrong. This is the collapse of work - especially among America's men. Political economist Nicholas Eberstadt shows that while "unemployment" has gone down, America's work rate is also lower today than a generation ago - and that the work rate for US men has been spiraling downward for half a century. Astonishingly, the work rate for American males aged 25-54 - or "men of prime working age" - was actually slightly lower in 2015 than it had been in 1940, before the war and at the tail end of the Great Depression.
Today, nearly one in six prime working-age men has no paid work at all - and nearly one in eight is out of the labor force entirely, neither working nor even looking for work. This new normal of "men without work", argues Eberstadt, is "America's invisible crisis".
So who are these men? How did they get there? What are they doing with their time? And what are the implications of this exit from work for American society?
©2016 Nicholas Eberstadt (P)2017 TantorCe que les critiques en disent
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Men Without Work
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
-
Au global2 out of 5 stars
-
Performance5 out of 5 stars
-
Histoire1 out of 5 stars
- Daniel Bell
- 2023-05-15
hollow argument confusing data for moral inference
I was so incredibly disappointed. in the sample it was made clear that he wanted to not simply discuss a point of data or a series of points of data that point to a decline in men working, but far more critically the moral argument for why we should care.
I'm still tempted to make the argument that the reason why men have left the workforce is because they can. that individual decision making is based on the hand of cards witnessed by a given individual. if there are millions of men who have the power to not work telling them they ought to because they ought to because they ought to is meaningless.
The central thesis is missing from the book. what remains is a didactic conclusion without any justification. begging the question, circling back and doing so again.
I could not be more disappointed.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.