Mistakes Were Made (but Not By Me) Third Edition
Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Obtenez 3 mois à 0,99 $ par mois + 20 $ de crédit Audible
Mistakes Were Made (but Not By Me) Third Edition
Acheter pour 32,62 $
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Carol Tavris
-
Auteur(s):
-
Carol Tavris
-
Elliot Aronson
À propos de cet audio
Renowned social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson take a compelling look into how the brain is wired for self-justification. This updated edition concludes with an extended discussion of how we can live with dissonance, learn from it, and perhaps, eventually, forgive ourselves.
Why is it so hard to say “I made a mistake”—and really believe it?
When we make mistakes, cling to outdated attitudes, or mistreat other people, we must calm the cognitive dissonance that jars our feelings of self-worth. And so, unconsciously, we create fictions that absolve us of responsibility, restoring our belief that we are smart, moral, and right—a belief that often keeps us on a course that is dumb, immoral, and wrong. Backed by years of research, Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) offers a fascinating explanation of self-justification—how it works, the damage it can cause, and how we can overcome it.
“Entertaining, illuminating and—when you recognize yourself in the stories it tells—mortifying.”—Wall Street Journal
“Every page sparkles with sharp insight and keen observation. Mistakes were made—but not in this book!”—Daniel Gilbert, author of Stumbling on Happiness
I liked the analogy of “falling off the pyramid” to describe what happens to human reasoning, when descending into a frame of mind that more often than not doesn’t recognise this state of dissonance “a blind spot” and certainly cannot comprehend. Before reading the book, I always thought that “having a conscience” covered most of the bases of dissonance, but there again I’m no trained psychologist!
I was more than amused by the last hour or more the book, on their assessment of Trump. I listened carefully and couldn’t help thinking that both the authors were descending their own pyramid into their own dissonance their blind spot being ignored, the absolute fact that under the American electoral system, Trump was a democratically elected President. Dissonance is a two way street and I would personally have liked the authors to have been a little less partisan and more circumspect discussing other examples of dissonance, in their conclusion? I believe it’s what psychologists call “projection”, which means projecting onto others precisely the characteristics you yourself display but refuse to acknowledge. But that is a minor criticism of the book, which was a good read.
A Good Read
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Amazzzzing!!!
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
ok if not for the last chapter
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.