Politics or Polemic ? Stories or Springboard ?

While I thoroughly enjoyed reading McCall Smith's The No.1 Ladies Detective Agency series, I cannot say the same of his 44 Scotland series.
Through Angus Lordie, McCall Smith scarcely bothers to disguise the character's constant digressions on Scotland the mother ? father ? -land. These are intrusive, have little or usually nothing to do with the matters in hand, and become grating after the first 1/2 dozen. They contribute neither to the deveopment of character nor to the enhancement of story situations . What they do achieve is to provide him with a constant springboard from fiction to politics. I have always been an enthusiastic supporter of the independence of Scotland (surname Gordon ? what would you expect ? ). However, McCall Smith actually succeeded in making me question seriously how wrong the last, lost referendum was.
In 44 Scotland people seem to be only caricatures : weak wimps, manipulative Machiavellis, big and big hearted or small and vicious as badgers. I don't need or want to read about such sterotypes : all I have to do is listen to the news. Writers can use such types to satirize society, but I cannot detect any such effort on McCall Smith's part. He excells at creating people who are easy to dislike, even detest -- but he Does nothing with them. He uses every opportunity to launch into the political-verbal equivalent of Scotland the Brave.
Please Mr McCall Smith, do yourself and your readers a favour and cease and desist such low practices. Or read Maeve Binchy of Erin and learn from -- gasp ! horror of horrors ! -- a woman.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.