Page de couverture de Why Liberalism Failed

Why Liberalism Failed

Aperçu

Essayer pour 0,00 $
Choisissez 1 livre audio par mois dans notre incomparable catalogue.
Écoutez à volonté des milliers de livres audio, de livres originaux et de balados.
L'abonnement Premium Plus se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 14,95 $/mois + taxes applicables après 30 jours. Annulation possible à tout moment.

Why Liberalism Failed

Auteur(s): Patrick J. Deneen
Narrateur(s): Brian Holsopple
Essayer pour 0,00 $

14,95$ par mois après 30 jours. Annulable en tout temps.

Acheter pour 25,00 $

Acheter pour 25,00 $

Confirmer l'achat
Payer avec la carte finissant par
En confirmant votre achat, vous acceptez les conditions d'utilisation d'Audible et la déclaration de confidentialité d'Amazon. Des taxes peuvent s'appliquer.
Annuler

À propos de cet audio

Has liberalism failed because it has succeeded?

Of the three dominant ideologies of the 20th century - fascism, communism, and liberalism - only the last remains. This has created a peculiar situation in which liberalism's proponents tend to forget that it is an ideology and not the natural end-state of human political evolution. As Patrick Deneen argues in this provocative book, liberalism is built on a foundation of contradictions: It trumpets equal rights while fostering incomparable material inequality; its legitimacy rests on consent, yet it discourages civic commitments in favor of privatism; and in its pursuit of individual autonomy, it has given rise to the most far-reaching, comprehensive state system in human history.

Here, Deneen offers an astringent warning that the centripetal forces now at work on our political culture are not superficial flaws but inherent features of a system whose success is generating its own failure.

©2018 Patrick J. Deneen (P)2018 Audible, Inc.
20th Century 21st Century Idéologies et doctrines Sciences politiques Inégalités économiques Disparités économiques
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Why Liberalism Failed

Moyenne des évaluations de clients
Au global
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    18
  • 4 étoiles
    6
  • 3 étoiles
    1
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    1
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    15
  • 4 étoiles
    3
  • 3 étoiles
    1
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    2
Histoire
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    16
  • 4 étoiles
    2
  • 3 étoiles
    2
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    1

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Classer par :
Filtrer
  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

Why Liberalism Failed

This is a book you will argue and disagree with, whether you are Liberal or Conservative or somewhere else on the political spectrum. Deneen puts forth many interesting ideas, some true, and some I think not true, bit what is undeniable is that this is a book that accurately describes certain aspects of the Age of Liberalism in which we live, and also proposes a variety of interesting alternatives and solutions for what ails us. I recommend that you read this book. 5/5

Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

intresting

great book that was well made a thought out and honestly everyone should read it.

Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars

The manifesto of a lunatic

I am not certain whether it was the narrator or the author that was more annoying. Between the jargon salad, yelling and lack of pauses between sentences, this book was hard to take. They lost me when trying to call out the deep state.

The author rightly identifies conservatism and progressivism as two separate waves of liberalism, he merges them or focuses on progressivism alone when it serves his critique.

He also name drops pre-liberal philosophers familiar to second-year political science majors such as Socrates, Plato, Augustine, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke and Mill in a way that might lead one to think that he didn't continue political thought in third year.

There are many valid critiques of Liberalism. The author seemed to be close at times, but generally came off as a bit of a disjointedclunatic. Give this title a pass.

Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile