OFFRE D'UNE DURÉE LIMITÉE | Obtenez 3 mois à 0.99 $ par mois

14.95 $/mois par la suite. Des conditions s'appliquent.
Page de couverture de Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

Auteur(s): Inception Point Ai
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de cet audio

 Welcome to "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast, your go-to source for in-depth insights into the groundbreaking AI regulations shaping the future of technology within the EU. Join us as we explore the intricacies of the AI Act, its impact on various industries, and the legal frameworks established to ensure ethical AI development and deployment.

Whether you're a tech enthusiast, legal professional, or business leader, this podcast provides valuable information and analysis to keep you informed and compliant with the latest AI regulations.

Stay ahead of the curve with "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast – where we decode the EU's AI policies and their global implications. Subscribe now and never miss an episode!

Keywords: European Union, Artificial Intelligence Act, AI regulations, EU AI policy, AI compliance, AI risk management, technology law, AI ethics, AI governance, AI podcast.

Copyright 2025 Inception Point Ai Politique Économie
Épisodes
  • HEADLINE: Europe Transforms into AI Powerhouse with Ambitious Regulatory Framework

    HEADLINE: Europe Transforms into AI Powerhouse with Ambitious Regulatory Framework
    Jan 10 2026
    I wake up to push notifications about the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act and, at this point, it feels less like a law and more like an operating system install for an entire continent.

    According to the European Commission, the AI Act has already entered into force and is rolling out in phases, with early rules on AI literacy and some banned practices already live and obligations for general‑purpose AI models – the big foundation models behind chatbots and image generators – kicking in from August 2025. Wirtek’s analysis walks through those dates and makes the point that for existing models, the grace period only stretches to 2027, which in AI years is about three paradigm shifts away.

    At the same time, Akin Gump reports that Brussels is quietly acknowledging the complexity by proposing, via its Digital Omnibus package, to push full implementation for high‑risk systems out to December 2027. That “delay” is less a retreat and more an admission: regulating AI is like changing the engine on a plane that’s not just mid‑flight, it’s also still being designed.

    The Future of Life Institute’s EU AI Act Newsletter this week zooms in on something more tangible: the first draft Code of Practice on transparency of AI‑generated content. Hundreds of people from industry, academia, civil society, and member states have been arguing over how to label deepfakes and synthetic text. Euractiv’s Maximilian Henning even notes the proposal for a common EU icon – essentially a tiny “AI” badge for images and videos – a kind of nutritional label for reality itself.

    Meanwhile, Baker Donelson and other legal forecasters are telling compliance teams that as of August 2025, providers of general‑purpose AI must disclose training data summaries and compute, while downstream users have to make sure they’re not drifting into prohibited zones like indiscriminate facial recognition. Suddenly, “just plug in an API” becomes “run a fundamental‑rights impact assessment and hope your logs are in order.”

    Zoom out and the European Parliament’s own “Ten issues to watch in 2026” frames the AI Act as the spine of a broader digital regime: GDPR tightening enforcement, the Data Act unlocking access to device data, and the Digital Markets Act nudging gatekeepers – from cloud providers to app stores – to rethink how AI services are integrated and prioritized.

    Critics on both sides are loud. Some founders grumble that Europe is regulating itself into irrelevance while the United States and China sprint ahead. But voices around the Apply AI Strategy, presented by Henna Virkkunen, argue that the AI Act is the boundary and Apply AI is the accelerator: regulation plus investment as a single, coordinated bet that trustworthy AI can be a competitive advantage, not a handicap.

    So as listeners experiment with new models, synthetic media, and “shadow AI” tools inside their own organizations, Europe is effectively saying: you can move fast, but here is the crash barrier, here are the guardrails, and here is the audit trail you’ll need when something goes wrong.

    Thanks for tuning in, and don’t forget to subscribe.

    This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Voir plus Voir moins
    4 min
  • Headline: EU's AI Act Transitions from Theory to Tangible Reality by 2026

    Headline: EU's AI Act Transitions from Theory to Tangible Reality by 2026
    Jan 8 2026
    Listeners, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act has quietly moved from PDF to power move, and 2026 is the year it really starts to bite.

    The AI Act is already in force, but the clock is ticking toward August 2026, when its core rules for so‑called high‑risk AI fully apply across the 27 Member States. According to the European Parliament’s own “Ten issues to watch in 2026,” that is the moment when this goes from theory to daily operational constraint for anyone building or deploying AI in Europe. At the same time, the Commission’s Digital Omnibus proposal may push some deadlines out to 2027 or 2028, so even the timeline is now a live political battlefield.

    Brussels has been busy building the enforcement machinery. The European Commission’s AI Office, sitting inside the Berlaymont, is turning into a kind of “AI control tower” for the continent, with units explicitly focused on AI safety, regulation and compliance, and AI for societal good. The AI Office has already launched an AI Act Single Information Platform and Service Desk, including an AI Act Compliance Checker and Explorer, to help companies figure out whether their shiny new model is a harmless chatbot or a regulated high‑risk system.

    For general‑purpose AI — the big foundation models from firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and European labs such as Mistral — the game changed in August 2025. Law firms like Baker Donelson point out that providers now have to publish detailed summaries of training data and document compute, while downstream users must ensure they are not drifting into prohibited territory like untargeted facial recognition scraping. European regulators are essentially saying: if your model scales across everything, your obligations scale too.

    Civil society is split between cautious optimism and alarm. PolicyReview.info and other critics warn that the AI Act carves out troubling exceptions for migration and border‑control AI, letting tools like emotion recognition slip through bans when used by border authorities. For them, this is less “trustworthy AI” and more a new layer of automated violence at the edges of Europe.

    Meanwhile, the Future of Life Institute’s EU AI Act Newsletter highlights a draft Code of Practice on transparency for AI‑generated content. Euractiv’s Maximilian Henning has already reported on the idea of a common European icon to label deepfakes and photorealistic synthetic media. Think of it as a future “nutrition label for reality,” negotiated between Brussels, industry, and civil society in real time.

    For businesses, 2026 feels like the shift from innovation theater to compliance engineering. Vendors like BigID are already coaching teams on how to survive audits: traceable training data, logged model behavior, risk registers, and governance that can withstand a regulator opening the hood unannounced.

    The deeper question for you, as listeners, is this: does the EU AI Act become the GDPR of algorithms — a de facto global standard — or does it turn Europe into the place where frontier AI happens somewhere else?

    Thanks for tuning in, and don’t forget to subscribe for more deep dives into the tech that’s quietly restructuring power. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease dot ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Voir plus Voir moins
    4 min
  • Crunch Time for Europe's AI Reckoning: Brussels Prepares for 2026 AI Act Showdown

    Crunch Time for Europe's AI Reckoning: Brussels Prepares for 2026 AI Act Showdown
    Jan 5 2026
    Imagine this: it's early January 2026, and I'm huddled in a Brussels café, steam rising from my espresso as snow dusts the cobblestones outside the European Commission's glass fortress. The EU AI Act isn't some distant dream anymore—it's barreling toward us like a high-velocity neural network, with August 2, 2026, as the ignition point when its core prohibitions, high-risk mandates, and transparency rules slam into effect across all 27 member states.

    Just weeks ago, on December 17, 2025, the European Commission dropped the first draft of the Code of Practice for marking AI-generated content under Article 50. Picture providers of generative AI systems—like those powering ChatGPT or Midjourney—now scrambling to embed machine-readable watermarks into every deepfake video, synthetic image, or hallucinated text. Deployers, think media outlets or marketers in Madrid or Milan, must slap clear disclosures on anything AI-touched, especially public-interest stuff or celeb-lookalike fakes, unless a human editor green-lights it with full accountability. The European AI Office is herding independent experts through workshops till June, weaving in feedback from over 180 stakeholders to forge detection APIs that survive even if a company ghosts the market.

    Meanwhile, Spain's AESIA unleashed 16 guidance docs from their AI sandbox—everything from risk management checklists to cybersecurity templates for high-risk systems in biometrics, hiring algorithms, or border control at places like Lampedusa. These non-binding gems cover Annex III obligations: data governance, human oversight, robustness against adversarial attacks. But here's the twist—enter the Digital Omnibus package. European Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis warned in a recent presser that Europe can't lag the digital revolution, proposing delays to 2027 for some high-risk rules, like AI sifting resumes or loan apps, to dodge a straitjacket on innovation amid the US-China AI arms race.

    Professor Toon Calders at the University of Antwerp calls it a quality seal—EU AI as the trustworthy gold standard. Yet Jan De Bruyne from KU Leuven counters: enforcement is king, or it's all vaporware. The AI Pact bridges the gap, urging voluntary compliance now, while the AI Office bulks up with six units to police general-purpose models. Critics howl it's regulatory quicksand, but as CGTN reports from Brussels, 2026 cements Europe's bid to script the global playbook—safe, rights-respecting AI for critical infrastructure, justice, and democracy.

    Will this Brussels effect ripple worldwide, or fracture into a patchwork with New York's RAISE Act? As developers sweat conformity assessments and post-market surveillance, one truth pulses: AI's wild west ends here, birthing an era where code bows to human dignity. Ponder that next time your feed floods with "slop"—is it real, or just algorithmically adorned?

    Thanks for tuning in, listeners—subscribe for more deep dives. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Voir plus Voir moins
    4 min
Pas encore de commentaire