• Field of 64 Reactions, Regional Previews

  • May 28 2024
  • Durée: 1 h et 6 min
  • Podcast

Field of 64 Reactions, Regional Previews

  • Résumé

  • On this episode of The Schoch Factor Podcast, Stephen Schoch, Jake Mintz and Jordan Shusterman react to the selection show and do their best to highlight what they are excited about and looking forward to in each regional. First, however, they give a nod to some of the fellas who they felt earned themselves a spot in the Field of 64 but got snubbed. It stinks how cutthroat this time of year is, but to those who left it all out there on the field, we thank you!

    02:45 Honoring the Players: A Tribute to Adam Cecere
    05:12 Conference Tournament Highlights
    08:26 Selection Controversies and Committee Bias
    20:23 Regional Breakdown: Knoxville and Greenville
    24:43 Regional Breakdown: Norman and Tallahassee
    30:31 Regional Breakdown: Fayetteville
    32:15 Charlottesville Regional Preview
    35:31 Tucson Regional Breakdown
    39:37 Chapel Hill Regional Insights
    42:09 Lexington Regional Analysis
    43:59 Corvallis Regional Highlights
    46:45 Raleigh Regional Overview
    48:53 Athens Regional Discussion
    53:45 College Station Regional Preview
    56:35 Santa Barbara Regional Breakdown
    58:25 Clemson Regional Insights
    01:01:20 Stillwater Regional Analysis
    01:03:38 Final Thoughts and Farewell

    The Schoch Factor is brought to you by Soldier Sports.
    Follow Stephen on Twitter: @BigDonkey47
    Follow Jake and Jordan on Twitter: @CespedesBBQ
    Follow the podcast on Twitter: @SchochFactorPod
    Subscribe to The Schoch Factor on Apple | Spotify

    The Schoch Factor is also brought to you by Baseball BBQ. Get all officially licensed college baseball grilling tools and cutting boards at www.BaseballBBQ.com!

    Voir plus Voir moins
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Field of 64 Reactions, Regional Previews

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.