Safety reporting in laboratories isn't just about checking boxes—it's about creating fundamental change that protects everyone. In this candid conversation, Dan Scungio and Sean Kaufman tackle the uncomfortable reality that many lab professionals face: reporting systems exist, but fear of punishment keeps critical safety information hidden.

What happens when a laboratory culture punishes those who speak up about safety concerns? The consequences extend far beyond incident rates. As Dan shares from his experiences as a safety officer, environments where staff fear retribution for reporting incidents create dangerous ripple effects that impact quality assurance and patient care. The hosts explore how power dynamics, from pathologists who ignore safety protocols to managers who punish those who report problems, create barriers to transparent safety cultures.

The critical difference between effective and ineffective reporting systems lies not in collecting data, but in what happens afterward. Sean and Dan discuss practical frameworks for closing the feedback loop, including the "stop, start, keep" model that empowers laboratory staff to identify and implement meaningful changes. True laboratory safety requires moving beyond assigning blame to sharing safety stories openly, ensuring that lessons learned become permanent improvements rather than lessons ignored. By fostering environments where reporting leads to action rather than punishment, laboratories can transform their safety culture from one of fear to one of collective responsibility and continuous improvement.

Have you experienced barriers to reporting safety concerns in your laboratory? Share your experiences and join the conversation about creating psychologically safe reporting environments.