Send us a text

Does God Exist? Part 2 - Debate - Greg Bahnsen Vs. Eddie Tabash Part 2

This formal debate between Dr. Bahnsen and atheist lawyer (former ACLU), Edward Tabash, at the University of California (Davis) in 1993, is a great follow-up to the Bahnsen-Stein debate. Witness again how an atheist fails to wrestle with fundamental philosophical issues

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

Baptism Part 2 - Debate - Fred Malone Vs. Robert Strimple

Robert Strimple and Fred Malone in a debate concerning the proper subjects of Baptism.

Baptism Debate Part 2: Fred Malone Vs. Robert Strimple

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

Baptism Part 1 - Debate - Fred Malone Vs. Robert Robert

Strimple and Fred Malone in a debate concerning the proper subjects of Baptism.

Baptism Debate Part 1: Fred Malone Vs. Robert Strimple

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

The Roman Catholic Part 3 - Debate - Greg Bahnsen Vs. Gerry Matatics and Father Michael Manning

In this 1992 radio dialog with a former Presbyterian turned Roman Catholic, Professor Jerry Matatics, and Catholic Priest, Father Michael Manning, Dr. Bahnsen maintained that Romanism has an unsound view of religious authority, allowing human tradition to override God's inspired word in Scripture and leading to untenable and even silly notions.

Support the show

Send us a text

The Roman Catholic Part 2 - Debate - Greg Bahnsen Vs. Gerry Matatics and Father Michael Manning

In this 1992 radio dialog with a former Presbyterian turned Roman Catholic, Professor Jerry Matatics, and Catholic Priest, Father Michael Manning, Dr. Bahnsen maintained that Romanism has an unsound view of religious authority, allowing human tradition to override God's inspired word in Scripture and leading to untenable and even silly notions.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

The Roman Catholic Part 1 - Debate - Greg Bahnsen Vs. Gerry Matatics and Father Michael Manning

In this 1992 radio dialog with a former Presbyterian turned Roman Catholic, Professor Jerry Matatics, and Catholic Priest, Father Michael Manning, Dr. Bahnsen maintained that Romanism has an unsound view of religious authority, allowing human tradition to override God's inspired word in Scripture and leading to untenable and even silly notions.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

A Gun Control Part 2 - Debate - Dr. Greg Bahnsen vs. Dr. James Atwood

This debate was subtitled “A Debate Over Gun Control and Biblical Morality”. Does the Bible speak to the issue of gun control?


Dr. Greg Bahnsen was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and resident scholar at the Southern California Center for Christian Studies.

Dr. James Atwood was a minister in the Presbyterian Church (USA) and served on the board of a handgun control lobby in Washington D.C.


The actual question debated was: “Is the civil regulation of firearms the scriptural norm for civil government?” The format of the debate included opening statements from both speakers followed by responses. There was an opportunity for each speaker to ask questions of the other with opportunity for a response. After closing remarks by the speakers, questions were taken from the audience.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Send us a text

A Gun Control Debate Part 1 - Debate - Dr. Greg Bahnsen vs. Dr. James Atwood

This debate was subtitled “A Debate Over Gun Control and Biblical Morality”. Does the Bible speak to the issue of gun control?


Dr. Greg Bahnsen was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and resident scholar at the Southern California Center for Christian Studies.

Dr. James Atwood was a minister in the Presbyterian Church (USA) and served on the board of a handgun control lobby in Washington D.C.


The actual question debated was: “Is the civil regulation of firearms the scriptural norm for civil government?” The format of the debate included opening statements from both speakers followed by responses. There was an opportunity for each speaker to ask questions of the other with opportunity for a response. After closing remarks by the speakers, questions were taken from the audience.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show