• Is this legit? Research reality check with Dr. Kirsten Lee Hill

  • Auteur(s): Kirsten Lee Hill
  • Podcast

Is this legit? Research reality check with Dr. Kirsten Lee Hill

Auteur(s): Kirsten Lee Hill
  • Résumé

  • Join your host, Dr. Kirsten Lee Hill, as she dives into the viral stats and facts sweeping the internet. Each week, she’ll check out into a new ‘research shows’ or ‘study finds’ making waves in the headlines and uncover whether it’s legit or not. Along the way, you’ll learn how to conduct better research, spot misleading claims, gather credible data, and make better decisions. Whether you’re a fellow data geek, an entrepreneur, a student, or just someone who loves a good data mystery, tune in to explore the power of data, the importance of transparency, and how to make sure you never get duped by “research” again.

    2024 Kirsten Lee Hill
    Voir plus Voir moins
Épisodes
  • Do Squats Regulate Blood Sugar Better than a 30-Minute Walk?
    Feb 4 2025

    In today’s episode, I’m tackling a viral health claim that sounds simple—but isn’t: that doing 10 squats every 45 minutes during an 8.5-hour period of sitting is better for blood sugar regulation than taking a 30-minute walk.

    Is that what the research actually says? Not quite.

    We’ll break down the study’s methodology, expose the grammatical ambiguity that helped this misinformation spread, and reveal how even AI initially misread the study.

    Plus, you’ll learn why you should make reading the methods section of research your superpower, how bad science communication erodes public trust, and why representation in research matters more than you think.

    Join me as I unpack what this study really found, challenge misleading claims, and share practical tips for spotting the next viral “science-backed” myth before it fools you.

    Referenced:

    • The Study
    • The Video on Instagram
    • The Tweet
    • The Newsweek Article


    Voir plus Voir moins
    23 min
  • Are AI’s Carbon Emissions For Writing Really Lower Than Ours?
    Jan 28 2025

    In today’s episode, I’m tackling the bold, research-backed claim that AI produces lower carbon emissions for writing and drawing than humans. We’ll break down the study’s methodology, question its framing, and uncover the glaring omissions that make its conclusions feel more like a pro-AI pitch than neutral science. Plus, you’ll learn what Mark Twain has to do with all of this and why apples-to-oranges carbon calculations can skew the bigger picture.

    Join me as I unpack the study’s findings, explore why bias in research matters, and share tips for critically evaluating the next viral “science-backed” claim you encounter.

    Referenced:

    • Scientific Reports article
    • The Writer Magazine
    • EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator
    • The Nature Conservancy’s footprint calculator
    Voir plus Voir moins
    26 min
  • Can a Triple Nod Improve Communication?
    Jan 21 2025

    In today’s episode, I’m diving into the viral claim behind the triple nod, touted as a research backed hack for better communication. We’ll trace its evolution over the years, explore the research (or lack thereof) that backs it up, and unpack how ambiguous stats and missing citations can turn into misinformation. From precise percentages to vague references, we’ll see whether this popular nonverbal cue holds up to scrutiny.

    Join me as I separate fact from fiction, explain why transparency in sharing “research” matters, and share tips for navigating the next viral stat you encounter.

    Referenced:

    • Mel Robbins Podcast
    • YouTube video for the speaker’s organization
    • The Carey Nieuwhof Leadership Podcast
    • Time Magazine article
    • LifeHacker
    • Science of People
    Voir plus Voir moins
    22 min

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Is this legit? Research reality check with Dr. Kirsten Lee Hill

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.