In carbon removal policy circles, three simple words - like-for-like - seem to come up more and more. It is a simple and obvious concept that is actually incredibly complex and misunderstood.
Robert Höglund joins Eve Tamme and Sebastian Manhart in exploring like-for-like as a concept, why it is becoming a core pillar of CDR policy design and what net-zero targets should actually look like.
Tune in to find out more
Links:
- Eve Tamme: LinkedIn and Website
- Sebastian Manhart: LinkedIn and Website
- Robert Höglund: LinkedIn, Website and Substack
- Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks
- The hidden risk in net zero targets: why storage durability matters
- How much carbon will we need to remove?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.