• ODR 005 – NonViolent Communication

  • Jan 5 2023
  • Durée: 36 min
  • Podcast

Page de couverture de ODR 005 – NonViolent Communication

ODR 005 – NonViolent Communication

  • Résumé


  • This episode is based on one of the most important books I have ever read: NonViolent Communication – A Language of Life by Marshall Rosenberg




    Nonviolent Communication is one of the most powerful ways of speaking with people that I have ever come across. It eliminates useless strategies like judgment and proving yourself right and instead gives you absolutely tactical techniques to get the things you need for happiness for yourself and your interlocutor.


    NVC is not a new, gimmicky set of dictum. It boils down the philosophies of Stoicism, the psychological approaches of CBT and cognitive psychology.


    Marshall Rosenberg was a psychologist trained in the classical analytic, but found it unsatisfying and for the most part, unhelpful.


    Speaking Giraffe vs. Speaking Jackal

    NVC is not really a theory or a guide to behavior–it is a language!!!


    Giraffes only hear feelings & needs, never thoughts


    Jackal language is about judging, criticizing, analyzing, moralizing and accusing. When we feel unfairly treated, accused or when we want to impose our wishes, we tend to use the language of the jackal. Jackal language is separating. Giraffe language is unifying.


     


    The System

    There are essentially two major parts–The four component speech creation and emergency empathy


    The Four Components1. Observation without EvaluationThere’s nothing good or bad but thinking makes it so.
    Shakespeare in Hamlet

    Avoid generalization, only

    specifics

    (generally good to avoid the past as well)


    Separate the observation from the evaluation or better yet, eliminate the evaluation


    You are the most inconsiderate person–you are always late


    J Krishnamurti: “observing without evaluating is the highest form of human intelligence”


    See page 30 for more on pitfalls in observing


    2. Feeling

    Internal emotional states vs. thoughts/judgment


    If you can replace I feel with I think–then it is not a feeling


    If I feel is followed by: that, like, or as if then it is not a feeling


    If I feel is followed by a name or pronoun (whether he, you, or I), then it is not a feeling


    Eliminate the feel–and see if it still works I feel sad to I’m sad works. I feel


    Could you feel it alone on a desert island–Ignored is not a feeling, unimportant is not a feeling, resentment is not a feeling b/c they require another to judge/act. It is a thought about how someone else is judging us




    p.45 has a list of positive and negative feelings



    Stoicism/CBT–We are the only ones responsible for our feelings


    We are responsible for everything we do (Replace I have to with I choose to)


    Do not connect the feelings to the observations through cause and effect. They relate–they are not caused by.


    When I observe X, I feel Y


    Even break it down to good/bad


    People are disturbed not by things, but by the view they take of them –Epictetus














    “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so” from

    “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare





    3. Needs

    Rosenberg identifies human needs as safety, understanding, respect, warmth,


    autonomy, etc. When needs are expressed indirectly through assessments


    and...

    Voir plus Voir moins
activate_primeday_promo_in_buybox_DT

Ce que les auditeurs disent de ODR 005 – NonViolent Communication

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.