 
                Retiring Right Before or During a Recession. Debunking "Sequence of Returns Risk" - Canadian Financial Summit 2024
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
- 
    
        
 
	
Narrateur(s):
- 
    
        
 
	
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Bloggers and advisors constantly warn about the "Sequence of Returns Risk"—the fear that retiring right before or during a market crash will drain your savings too quickly.
This fear often leads retirees to make poor investment choices, resulting in:
🚨 Inferior portfolios
📉 Lower returns
❌ A less reliable retirement
But how real is this risk? And do the conventional solutions—like investing in bonds or following the 4% Rule—actually work?
Is it true that "sequence of returns risk" has been debunked for long-term equity investors?
In my latest podcast episode you'll learn
-  What is "Sequence of Returns Risk"? 
-  What solutions are typically recommended? 
-  What is the actual risk of running out of money with a bad sequence of returns? 
-  Why don't the typical solutions work? 
-  How long did it take to recover from the biggest crashes? 
-  How can you get the maximum reliable retirement income? 
-  What should you do if your risk tolerance is lower? 
-  What is "Your Personal Rule" for you to use instead of the "4% Rule"? 
-  What solution to "Sequence of Returns Risk" actually works? 
-  What dynamic spending rules are suggested by actuaries & advisors? 
-  What is Ed's dynamic spending rule? 
-  How is it customized for you? 
 
            
         
    
                                                
                                            
                                        
                                    
                            
                            
                        
                    