In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!
First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!
Now onto the Scott Peterson case.
Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:
- Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson
- Originally sentenced to death penalty
- Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery
- Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence
Differing Legal Perspectives
- Lauren believes Peterson is guilty
- Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict
- Watch to learn their reasons!
There have been several new developments in the case:
- Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues
- New DNA evidence pending testing
- California nonprofit involvement in case review
- Discussion of potential new trial possibilities
Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:
- Jury selection process (voir dire)
- Discussion of circumstantial evidence
- Evolution of DNA evidence in court
- Changes in trial procedures due to technology
"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey
"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren
Looking Ahead:
- Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!
- Future episode on voir dire process planned
Where to Follow:
- Apple Podcasts
- YouTube
- Instagram
- Facebook
Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!
#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime