Bryan Kohberger was investigated for a home invasion eerily similar to the horrific crime he now stands accused of committing—the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students. The revelation, which emerged this week, has sent shockwaves through both the legal community and the public, raising profound questions about the odds of such coincidences and the investigative gaps that may have allowed a predator to escalate unchecked. The first case unfolded in October 2021, barely a year before the University of Idaho slayings, and less than 10 miles from the Moscow, Idaho, crime scene. A woman in Pullman, Washington, reported being awakened in the early morning hours by the sound of her bedroom door opening. She was met with a masked intruder armed with a knife. The assailant said nothing, his silence amplifying the terror. Acting with remarkable courage, the woman fought back, delivering a kick that sent the man stumbling before he fled through her closet and out of the home. The parallels between the two cases are impossible to ignore. Both crimes occurred in the dead of night when the victims were at their most vulnerable. In each instance, the perpetrator wore a mask and wielded a knife. The silent, calculated manner in which the Pullman assailant moved through the home mirrors the modus operandi alleged in the Idaho murders. Yet, while the 2021 incident ended with the victim’s escape and survival, the Moscow tragedy resulted in the deaths of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves, and Madison Mogen—a crime so heinous it has captivated the nation’s attention. When Kohberger was arrested in December 2022, authorities began scrutinizing his past, seeking any signs of violent tendencies or precursors to the alleged killings. Their investigation led them to revisit the Pullman home invasion. Kohberger was named a person of interest, but law enforcement ultimately cleared him. According to police, his height did not match the victim’s description of the intruder, and he had not yet enrolled at Washington State University at the time of the attack. “We have no reason or evidence to believe he was involved in this burglary at this time,” Pullman police told ABC News. Still, the lingering questions remain. How rare is it for someone to be linked, even tangentially, to two such similar crimes? Is it a coincidence, or does it suggest a pattern that went unnoticed? The odds, as some experts suggest, strain credulity. For Kohberger’s defense team, the Pullman case represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, the unresolved nature of the 2021 break-in could bolster their argument that another individual with a similar modus operandi may be responsible for the Idaho murders. On the other hand, the eerie similarities between the two incidents could make it harder for jurors to ignore the implication of a connection. Adding to the complexity is the timing of the revelations. The Pullman incident had largely faded from public memory until body camera footage from the 2021 investigation surfaced. In it, the victim recounts the chilling encounter with clarity: “I heard my door open and I looked over, and someone was wearing a ski mask and had a knife. I kicked the s--t out of their stomach and screamed super loud, and they like flew back into my closet and then ran out my door and up the stairs.” Her statement paints a picture of a terrifying but brief encounter, one that underscores her sheer will to survive. In Moscow, however, the outcome was tragically different. The four students, attacked in their sleep, never had the chance to defend themselves. The contrast between these outcomes—one victim escaping, four others losing their lives—raises critical questions about what changed in the intervening year. Did the perpetrator learn from the failed attempt in Pullman? Did the crime in 2021 represent an early, unsophisticated attempt that escalated into the meticulously planned massacre in 2022? These are questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys alike will likely explore as Kohberger’s trial unfolds. The trial, set to begin in August 2025, is already shaping up to be one of the most closely watched in recent history. With a change of venue to Ada County due to concerns about pretrial publicity, the case will proceed in two phases: the first to determine guilt or innocence, the second to decide whether Kohberger, if convicted, will face the death penalty. In motions filed earlier this year, Kohberger’s defense team sought to remove the death penalty as an option, citing procedural and evidentiary concerns. The judge denied these motions, leaving the ultimate fate of the accused in the hands of a jury. As the legal teams prepare for trial, the Pullman case looms in the background, a chilling reminder of the unresolved questions that haunt both the prosecution and the defense. For the families of the Idaho victims, the trial represents a step toward...
