Welcome to the Ubuntu Institute of Ideas Podcast

This episode challenges everything you thought you knew about Africa’s place in the global economy. Today, we rip off the veil of complacency and dive into the heart of a story that has been written for centuries—a story of shackles disguised as aid, dependency disguised as development, and power systems designed to suppress, not uplift.

But here’s the truth: Africa is not a victim. It is a sleeping giant, ready to awaken.

In this episode, we tackle the invisible chains of debt traps, the exploitative frameworks of the IMF and World Bank, and the systemic designs that keep Africa tethered to dependence. We’ll uncover how these forces have stifled food sovereignty, hijacked energy independence, and locked the continent out of the global industrial value chain.

This isn’t just a history lesson—it’s an urgent exploration of the present and a blueprint for the future. Together, we’ll explore how Africa can forge its own path:

• Breaking the grip of financial imperialism.
• Unlocking the power of renewable energy sovereignty.
• Reclaiming its role as a global industrial leader.

We’re not just discussing problems; we’re igniting solutions. This is about building a future where Africa no longer asks for a seat at the table but creates its own.

So, lean in. Get uncomfortable. Let your perceptions be challenged. By the time this episode ends, you won’t just be informed—you’ll be inspired to reimagine Africa’s destiny and your role in shaping it.

The revolution begins now. Let’s dive in.

Welcome to Ubuntu Institute of Ideas, where we dissect Africa's role in shaping global power structures. Today, we’re tackling a burning issue: Africa's call for two permanent seats on the UN Security Council (UNSC). This is more than a debate about seats at a table—it’s a fight for justice, representation, and a voice in the decisions that shape our world.

The Case for Change

The current UNSC structure is a relic from the post-World War II era, stuck in a geopolitical time warp. How can a continent with 54 nations, home to over a billion people and at the epicentre of global security challenges, remain voiceless in the council's permanent membership? Africa’s absence is a glaring gap in a body claiming to represent global interests. It undermines the council’s legitimacy, making its decisions seem biased and disconnected from the realities of today’s interconnected world. Advocates argue that granting permanent seats to Africa would right a historical wrong and inject fresh perspectives into addressing security challenges. With the upcoming Summit of the Future, this debate isn’t just theoretical—it’s an opportunity to rewrite history.

Points of Tension

But, as with all change, there’s resistance. Should Africa’s permanent members have veto power? The U.S. supports the idea of seats but draws the line at the veto, leaving many Africans asking: Is this real reform, or just lip service? Then there’s the tricky question of who represents Africa. Will rivalries between nations slow down progress? Some argue the problem is bigger than just representation. Critics are calling for a complete overhaul of the UNSC—abolishing vetoes, democratizing the council, or even rethinking its very existence. And let’s not ignore the whispers: Is the West’s sudden push for reform a strategic play to curb China and Russia’s growing influence in Africa?

Why This Matters

Africa’s demand for UNSC reform isn’t just about politics—it’s about reclaiming agency. The stakes are high, and the world is watching. Will this be a moment of transformation, or just another chapter of empty promises? Join us as we unpack the complexities, break down the power dynamics, and explore what this means for Africa and the world. This is Ubuntu Institute of Ideas—because Africa’s story is global, and it’s time the world started listening.

Considering Cameroon’s colonial history and France’s enduring influence through mechanisms like the CFA franc, can the country ever achieve genuine economic independence without severing ties to these neo-colonial structures? The question isn’t just about economics—it’s about reclaiming agency in a system designed to perpetuate dependence. What would a bold break look like, and what risks or rewards might it bring?

At 91 years old, President Paul Biya’s decades-long rule has shaped Cameroon’s trajectory, often through silencing dissent and eliminating rivals. As his era draws to a close, the nation faces an uncertain future. Can Cameroon navigate a peaceful and democratic transition of power, or is it teetering on the edge of instability in the absence of a clear succession plan?

The Anglophone crisis continues to fester, exposing deep-seated grievances among those who feel excluded from Cameroon’s political and economic systems. What will it take to address this historic marginalization and foster reconciliation in a nation where unity often feels like an elusive dream?

Beyond politics, Cameroon’s ethnic and linguistic divides have fuelled decades of conflict and stalled national progress. How can the country transcend these divisions to build a cohesive identity—one that embraces its diversity while working toward a shared vision of prosperity?

And finally, as Africa increasingly pushes back against French influence, Cameroon finds itself at a crossroads in its foreign policy. Can it assert a more independent stance without severing ties to a former colonial power that still wields significant economic and geopolitical leverage?

These are the hard questions that Cameroon must confront, and their answers will determine not just the nation’s trajectory, but its ability to define its own future in a rapidly shifting global landscape.