• Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25

  • Jan 24 2025
  • Durée: 1 h et 17 min
  • Podcast

Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

  • Résumé

  • Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    Voir plus Voir moins
Voir plus Voir moins

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Why Anchor-Baby Citizenship Is Actually Repugnant to the Constitution | 1/24/25

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Évaluations sur Audible.ca

Évaluations sur Amazon.ca
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.