Faces at the Bottom of the Well
The Permanence of Racism
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wish list failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $25.23
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Brad Raymond
-
Written by:
-
Derrick Bell
-
Michelle Alexander - foreword
About this listen
The classic work on American racism and the struggle for racial justice
In Faces at the Bottom of the Well, civil rights activist and legal scholar Derrick Bell uses allegory and historical example to argue that racism is an integral and permanent part of American society. African American struggles for equality are doomed to fail so long as the majority of Whites do not see their own wellbeing threatened by the status quo. Bell calls on African Americans to face up to this unhappy truth and abandon a misplaced faith in inevitable progress. Only then will Blacks, and those Whites who join with them, be in a position to create viable strategies to alleviate the burdens of racism. "Freed of the stifling rigidity of relying unthinkingly on the slogan 'we shall overcome,'" he writes, "we are impelled both to live each day more fully and to examine critically the actual effectiveness of traditional civil rights remedies."
©1992 Derrick Bell (P)2018 Hachette AudioWhat the critics say
"Effective...chilling." (New York Times Book Review)
"A disturbing but ultimately inspiring book." (San Francisco Chronicle)
"Eerily prophetic, almost haunting, and yet at the same time oddly reassuring." (Michelle Alexander, from the foreword)
What listeners say about Faces at the Bottom of the Well
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Andrew
- 2021-10-20
Foundational philosophy on par with Aristotle
Critical arguments on the permanence of racism and the limitations of legal remedies. The use of allegory is essential to providing context beyond case studies of legal precedents. The characters provide nuanced debates for exploring ideas. Avoiding straw man positions.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!