Galileo's Error
Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wish list failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Audible Standard 1-month free trial
Auto-renews at $8.99/mo + applicable tax after 30-day trial. Cancel Anytime
Buy Now for $21.97
-
Narrated by:
-
Maxwell Caulfield
-
Written by:
-
Philip Goff
Understanding how brains produce consciousness is one of the great scientific challenges of our age. Some philosophers argue that consciousness is something "extra," beyond the physical workings of the brain. Others think that if we persist in our standard scientific methods, our questions about consciousness will eventually be answered. And some suggest that the mystery is so deep, it will never be solved.
In Galileo's Error, Philip Goff offers an exciting alternative that could pave the way forward. Rooted in an analysis of the philosophical underpinnings of modern science and based on the early twentieth-century work of Arthur Eddington and Bertrand Russell, Goff makes the case for panpsychism, a theory which posits that consciousness is not confined to biological entities but is a fundamental feature of all physical matter--from subatomic particles to the human brain. Here is the first step on a new path to the final theory of human consciousness.
Cover image: Gold Beam Collision Recorded at STAR. Copyright Brookhaven National Laboratory (Creative Commons). Full image available at Flickr.com.
You may also enjoy...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Great Read
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
WOW Amazing!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Howewer, panpsychism seeks to insert consciousness as the missing link without any real evidence that it is. There are spooky effects in the universe that can be experienced but this boodoesn't really flesh out why consciousness adequately describes those spooky effects.
I'd have appreciated a better description of what was being solved (or proposed to be solved) and why panpsychism fits.
The author is careful to say this isn't some new-age hippy nonsense, yet what he describes comes across as precisely that with no effort to differentiate.
Maybe I missed something.
There is a kernel of truth here, but what is proposed doesn't seem to fit the problem.
Interesting idea taken too far
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.