Why Liberalism Failed cover art

Why Liberalism Failed

Preview

Try for $0.00
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo + applicable taxes after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Why Liberalism Failed

Written by: Patrick J. Deneen
Narrated by: Brian Holsopple
Try for $0.00

$14.95 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for $25.00

Buy Now for $25.00

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Tax where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

Has liberalism failed because it has succeeded?

Of the three dominant ideologies of the 20th century - fascism, communism, and liberalism - only the last remains. This has created a peculiar situation in which liberalism's proponents tend to forget that it is an ideology and not the natural end-state of human political evolution. As Patrick Deneen argues in this provocative book, liberalism is built on a foundation of contradictions: It trumpets equal rights while fostering incomparable material inequality; its legitimacy rests on consent, yet it discourages civic commitments in favor of privatism; and in its pursuit of individual autonomy, it has given rise to the most far-reaching, comprehensive state system in human history.

Here, Deneen offers an astringent warning that the centripetal forces now at work on our political culture are not superficial flaws but inherent features of a system whose success is generating its own failure.

©2018 Patrick J. Deneen (P)2018 Audible, Inc.
20th Century 21st Century Ideologies & Doctrines Political Science Economic Inequality Economic disparity
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about Why Liberalism Failed

Average Customer Ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    18
  • 4 Stars
    6
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    15
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    2
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    16
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Why Liberalism Failed

This is a book you will argue and disagree with, whether you are Liberal or Conservative or somewhere else on the political spectrum. Deneen puts forth many interesting ideas, some true, and some I think not true, bit what is undeniable is that this is a book that accurately describes certain aspects of the Age of Liberalism in which we live, and also proposes a variety of interesting alternatives and solutions for what ails us. I recommend that you read this book. 5/5

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

intresting

great book that was well made a thought out and honestly everyone should read it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

The manifesto of a lunatic

I am not certain whether it was the narrator or the author that was more annoying. Between the jargon salad, yelling and lack of pauses between sentences, this book was hard to take. They lost me when trying to call out the deep state.

The author rightly identifies conservatism and progressivism as two separate waves of liberalism, he merges them or focuses on progressivism alone when it serves his critique.

He also name drops pre-liberal philosophers familiar to second-year political science majors such as Socrates, Plato, Augustine, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke and Mill in a way that might lead one to think that he didn't continue political thought in third year.

There are many valid critiques of Liberalism. The author seemed to be close at times, but generally came off as a bit of a disjointedclunatic. Give this title a pass.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful