In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!

First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!

Now onto the Scott Peterson case.

Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:

• Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson
• Originally sentenced to death penalty
• Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery
• Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence

Differing Legal Perspectives

• Lauren believes Peterson is guilty
• Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict
• Watch to learn their reasons!

There have been several new developments in the case:

• Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues
• New DNA evidence pending testing
• California nonprofit involvement in case review
• Discussion of potential new trial possibilities

Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:

• Jury selection process (voir dire)
• Discussion of circumstantial evidence
• Evolution of DNA evidence in court
• Changes in trial procedures due to technology

"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey

"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren

Looking Ahead:

• Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!
• Future episode on voir dire process planned

Where to Follow:

• Apple Podcasts
• YouTube
• Instagram
• Facebook

Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!

#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime