Episodes

  • #56 The Empire strikes back - Ep 3 Money not Morality ended British enslavement

    #56 The Empire strikes back - Ep 3 Money not Morality ended British enslavement
    Feb 26 2025
    We look at a map of the British Caribbean to understand why losing the British north American colonies after 1783 mattered to British enslavement. We explore how the trade winds had helped create the four-cornered ‘triangle’ of the British slave trade involving North America, Africa, England and the British Caribbean – and how this doesn't work once this section of the 'Empire' - the North American States - strikes back and becomes 'out of bounds' for British trade. And we begin to see why the British government, having fought at great expense to protect the British Caribbean in the American War of Independence, began to isolate the British planters in the Caribbean and favour the East India Company instead. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    37 mins
  • #55 The woman behind the abolition of slavery - Ep 2 Money not Morality ended British enslavement

    #55 The woman behind the abolition of slavery - Ep 2 Money not Morality ended British enslavement
    Feb 19 2025
    efore we get down to the hard facts of whether or not British enslavement ended because the slave economy no longer worked, we should take a closer look at the moral campaign for its abolition. It turns out to be intriguing, though it was a very different campaign from what we’ve all been told (and many students are apparently still being taught). Credit for the campaign’s success should go to Margaret Middleton and an enormous number of people who aren’t much remembered now. Not just William Wilberforce. The campaign of course stretches from the 1780s to the 1830s. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    35 mins
  • #54 'Slavery was even worse than we thought' - Ep 1 Money not Morality ended British enslavement

    #54 'Slavery was even worse than we thought' - Ep 1 Money not Morality ended British enslavement
    Feb 12 2025
    We start this 5-part series by trying to give a factual outline of the experience of being transported in horrendous conditions from Africa to the British Caribbean against your will. And we open up the debate started in 1938 by the brilliant young Trinidadian historian Eric Williams as to whether it was money or morality that ended British enslavement? The trade in the enslaved was banned in 1807, the enslaved were 'emancipated' in 1833. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    36 mins
  • #72 It was mainly the poor who burned - Ep 5 Bloody Mary Tudor?

    #72 It was mainly the poor who burned - Ep 5 Bloody Mary Tudor?
    Feb 5 2025
    Most of those executed for their beliefs under Philip and Mary 1555-58 came from places with a long history of religious dissidence. It matches European evidence that many – perhaps most – of those burned at the stake were not Protestants, but ‘anabaptists’ or people with similar beliefs – usually poor - whom both Protestants and Catholics were persecuting. The government of Edward VI had already begun before Mary came to the throne. But why so many in England? We discover literature appearing from the late 1540s that openly encouraged dissenters to die for their beliefs. And we explore the possibility that so many died because the English uniquely insisted on public hearings, in which there was no room for quiet, face-saving compromises. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    43 mins
  • #71 Most who were burned were not Protestants - Ep 4 Bloody Mary Tudor?

    #71 Most who were burned were not Protestants - Ep 4 Bloody Mary Tudor?
    Jan 29 2025
    Until six weeks before the child was due, everybody at court and indeed in Europe, believed Mary was pregnant. She suffered a rare disorder - pseudocyesis - maybe triggered by a tumour on her pituitary gland that would eventually kill her. The imminent birth of a Catholic heir to the Anglo-Spanish dynasty meant that the select council governing the kingdom really now had no alternative but to grasp the nettle of suppressing any potential causes of unrest – including any remaining shreds of die-hard Protestantism - and promptly. We also discover, that the majority of those who were burned were not Protestants at all, but followers of much older, rural religions. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    42 mins
  • #70 More interested in pirates than heretics - Ep 3 Bloody Mary Tudor?

    #70 More interested in pirates than heretics - Ep 3 Bloody Mary Tudor?
    Jan 22 2025
    Who ran the persecution of heretics in England 1555-58? England was a joint monarchy but historians traditionally accused bigoted Mary of running the clamp down herself - with her cousin, Reginald Pole the Archbishop of Canterbury. There’s no evidence it’s true and Pole was useless at running anything. But didn’t Mary intervene to make sure Thomas Cranmer was burned – Henry VIII’s archbishop? No, again. Cranmer was tried by the pope and Mary had no power to spare him. As for Mary’s Privy Council, they turn out to have been more interested in pirates than heretics. Much more important was Bartolomé Carranza, a Spanish friar, King Philip’s trusted eyes and ears at the English Court, but he was later accused of heresy by the pope for being too lenient. Finally the campaign in England was distinctively English, not Spanish. That points the finger for responsibility at Philip’s own select council of veteran English courtiers. But almost all of them had for years been Protestants. What was going on? (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    39 mins
  • #69 Who exactly was a heretic? - Ep 2 Bloody Mary Tudor?

    #69 Who exactly was a heretic? - Ep 2 Bloody Mary Tudor?
    Jan 15 2025
    England in the mid-1550s was being governed by a joint monarchy: Philip and Mary and a select council of extremely able English politicians. Almost all of them had experience in government stretching back through the violently protestant regime of Edward VI. To all appearances they had for years been living as active protestants. And yet here they were in a government that was conducting a campaign against religious heresy that we have always understood to be a Catholic campaign to stamp out Protestantism. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    38 mins
  • #68 Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! - Ep 1 Bloody Mary Tudor?

    #68 Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! - Ep 1 Bloody Mary Tudor?
    Jan 8 2025
    Bloody Queen Mary? 313 people died for their beliefs 1555-58. We owe it to the victims to get the story right. In 2020 historian Alexander Samson said about the reign of Mary Tudor ‘it feels as if we are at the start.’ So dismiss everything you thought you knew and be prepared to be amazed. Ever since Mary died childless, at the age of just 42 in 1558, the history of her reign was written almost exclusively by English Protestant historians, mainly using Foxe’s ‘Book of Martyrs’ written by an Elizabethan Protestant. We look at why Foxe exclusively blames Mary and why he’s wrong. (R)

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    Show more Show less
    40 mins