Épisodes

  • RECONsider... Rethinking Learning with Bill Hartman | Episode #67

    RECONsider... Rethinking Learning with Bill Hartman | Episode #67
    Jul 13 2025
    Live Q&A Calls with Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode Overview In this episode, Chris and Bill scrutinize the “Four Stages of Competence” model — a familiar framework in coaching and skill acquisition that assumes learners progress linearly from ignorance to mastery. They unpack its HR origins, explain why it lacks empirical grounding, and offer a counterpoint rooted in systems thinking. Rather than stages, they propose a lens of behavioral recognition: what you see is always a solution — it just may not be desirable. This discussion reframes learning as a dynamic reorganization of behavior in response to constraint, not a climb up a competence ladder. Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – Why We’re Talking About “Learning” Chris introduces the episode theme — learning models, coaching cues, and why it’s time to re-evaluate default assumptions. 04:00 – The “Four Stages” Origin Story Bill describes how the popular learning stages (unconscious incompetence → unconscious competence) emerged from 1970s HR training — not research. 07:00 – Linearity vs. Complexity The central critique: human learning is not linear. The model imposes artificial order on what is fundamentally a dynamic, complex adaptive system. 10:00 – “Incompetence” Isn’t Incompetent Every observed behavior is a solution. Even inefficient movement solves a problem within a person’s constraints — structurally or contextually. 14:00 – Coaching Without Context Fails Chris and Bill discuss how many coaching strategies fail when they don’t respect structure. You can’t cue someone out of constraint they don’t know they’re solving. 18:00 – Behavioral Recognition Over Labels Bill emphasizes that his quadrants aren’t stages. They’re representations of observable behavior — which helps tailor tasks and constraints more effectively. 23:00 – You’re Not Coaching a Blank Slate Chris makes the point that what you're seeing isn’t raw potential — it's a system using the only strategies it currently has access to. 28:00 – The Limits of Cueing A coach’s words can’t override structural or energetic constraints. You have to meet the system where it is — and shape the conditions around it. 32:00 – Adaptive Behavior, Not Error What’s often labeled "wrong" or "dysfunctional" may be adaptive. Recognizing this changes how we view interventions and outcomes. 36:00 – Evolving the Model (Again) Bill recounts how his own quadrant framework evolved as he tested it — referencing influence from Dave Snowden’s Cynefin model of complexity. 41:00 – Interventions as Design, Not Correction Once you understand what the system is solving for, you can build tasks that shift its strategy, rather than try to force behavior through coaching alone. 45:00 – Wrapping Up: The System Solves Itself They close by reinforcing that learning is not about filling gaps — it’s about reorganizing behavior under constraint, and the coach’s job is to create the right container for that to happen. Key Takeaways The “Four Stages” Are a Mental Shortcut They may feel intuitive, but they describe neither how humans behave nor how systems adapt. Their linearity oversimplifies learning. Every Behavior Is a Solution Movement — even if awkward or compensatory — reflects the best available solution to the system’s current constraints. That’s competence, just not your preferred version. Learning Is Emergent, Not Staged Adaptation doesn’t follow steps. It unfolds in response to pressure, structure, and context. That process is inherently non-linear. Observations Over Classifications Labels like “incompetent” blind us to what's actually happening. Watch what people do. Understand what it's solving for. Models Should Breathe Even the quadrant model evolved through testing. If your model isn’t helping you see clearly, evolve it — or discard it. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies at https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium
    Voir plus Voir moins
    48 min
  • Reconsider... Stop Training Your Core with Bill Hartman | Episode #66

    Reconsider... Stop Training Your Core with Bill Hartman | Episode #66
    Jun 29 2025
    Free articles and courses about movement from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode Overview In this episode, Chris and Bill take aim at the overused and under-defined concept of "core training." They unpack how the term has been inflated into a one-size-fits-all solution for pain, posture, and performance — without coherence or clarity. Drawing on clinical cases, archetypal differences, and system-based reasoning, they challenge the belief that isolated core work translates into better outcomes. Instead, they argue that shape change, pressure management, and breathing strategies drive true performance and resilience. Through sharp critiques and practical examples, the episode reframes "the core" not as something to target — but something that emerges when the system is behaving well. Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – Core as a Catch-All Chris opens by calling out how core training has become a default prescription in rehab and fitness — whether or not it's relevant. 02:45 – The Problem with “Core Weakness” Bill highlights how “core” is often blamed without a coherent explanation of what’s actually weak, where, and why. 05:10 – What Does the Core Even Mean? They break down the vagueness of the term itself — anatomical definitions vary, and functional meaning is rarely clear. 08:00 – The Myth of Bracing The discussion shifts to bracing strategies, exposing how they can reduce movement options, increase rigidity, and elevate internal pressure — especially in wide archetypes. 11:25 – Structure Shapes Strategy They explore how narrow and wide ISAs respond differently to load and pressure. “Core work” done in isolation often mismatches structural needs. 14:50 – Breathing vs. Bracing Chris emphasizes that coherent systems don’t need to brace — they breathe. Breathing modulates pressure, supports shape change, and restores variability. 17:30 – Positional Relevance The team discusses how load placement, stance, and archetype determine whether an activity supports or disrupts systemic behavior. 20:20 – Rehab Defaults and Lazy Logic They critique the tendency in clinical settings to assign core training as a blanket intervention, often without resolving the real constraint. 23:00 – A Better Question: What Is This Shape Solving For? Instead of asking how to strengthen the core, they ask what the observed shape is trying to solve. This opens up more relevant, individualized solutions. 26:15 – Core Emerges, It’s Not Targeted They close by stating that “the core” isn’t something to train in isolation. It’s what appears when the system’s timing, shape, and pressure behavior are coherent. Key Takeaways “The Core” Lacks Coherence The term is too vague to be useful. It’s become a placeholder for problems we haven’t fully diagnosed. Bracing is Not the Answer Most core training uses bracing as a fix — but that often compresses options and distorts the system's ability to move. Breath Drives Support Coherent systems don’t stabilize through tension — they use pressure gradients, breath, and timing to support action. Structure Shapes Need Different archetypes demand different strategies. Core work that ignores structure will likely create conflict. Ask Better Questions Instead of treating core weakness as a cause, ask: What is the current shape solving for? What constraint is driving it? Emergence Over Isolation Core integrity isn’t trained — it emerges when the system organizes itself well under load, direction, and breath. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies at https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium
    Voir plus Voir moins
    28 min
  • RECONsider... Posture is a Myth with Bill Hartman | Episode #65

    RECONsider... Posture is a Myth with Bill Hartman | Episode #65
    Jun 15 2025
    Free articles and courses about movement from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode Overview In this episode, Chris and Bill deconstruct the idea of posture as a static ideal or diagnostic tool. Instead, they define posture as a real-time behavioral strategy — a momentary expression of how the system organizes itself under pressure, context, and constraint. Moving beyond outdated binaries like “good” and “bad” posture, they explore posture as a reflection of internal state and systemic coherence. Through clinical insights, vivid metaphors, and practical examples, the conversation reframes posture not as something to fix, but something to understand. #posture #health #movement #fitness #physicaltherapy #lowbackpain Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – What Is Posture? The episode opens with a challenge to the traditional view of posture as something to correct. Chris and Bill reframe it as behavior — an adaptive output to meet constraint. 05:30 – Strategy vs. Alignment They differentiate posture as strategy, not structure. What we see is a system trying to solve a problem, not failing to achieve alignment. 09:45 – Why “Ideal Posture” Is a Myth Bill critiques rehab and fitness standards for ideal posture, showing they overlook the influence of energetic state, phase of propulsion, and structural variability. 14:10 – Context Creates Posture Posture doesn’t exist in isolation. It's created by environment, load, and intent. The same shape can have different meanings depending on context. 19:30 – Posture as Internal Expression They explain that posture reflects how pressure and energy are being managed internally. You can’t “fix” posture without shifting the internal strategy. 24:40 – Subtle Behavior Signals From breathing to gaze, small behaviors contribute to posture. These subtle motor patterns express how the system is managing demand. 30:10 – Repetition vs. Responsiveness Chris and Bill warn that repetitive posture cueing may enforce rigidity. The goal isn’t a perfect shape, but a flexible system that can reorganize freely. 36:25 – Posture Under Load Real-world posture shows up most under pressure. They examine how system behavior changes with axial load, asymmetry, or protective compensation. 42:00 – Not a Fault, but a Strategy Postures often labeled as “poor” — like slouching — may actually be protective strategies. Shape is a clue, not a flaw. 48:10 – Clinical Language Shift They offer examples of how decoding posture — rather than correcting it — opens insight into what the system is trying to solve. 54:20 – A New Lexicon The episode closes by challenging the use of terms like “dysfunction.” Instead, posture should be seen as “expressed strategy” — a dynamic behavior, not a fixed trait. Key Takeaways Posture Is Behavior, Not Structure: It’s an ongoing solution, not a measurable static state. There Is No Ideal: “Good” or “bad” posture misses the point. What matters is the adaptive strategy behind the shape. It Reflects Systemic Strategy: Posture shows how the system is handling internal pressure, breath, and coherence — not alignment scores. Context Drives Meaning: The same posture may mean different things under different loads or intentions. Context makes the behavior legible. Correction Doesn’t Equal Change: Suppressing a posture may block the system’s strategy without resolving the constraint. Build Capacity, Not Compliance: The goal is a system that can change shapes — not one that holds the “right” one. Rethink the Target: Posture is a proxy for internal state. Instead of fixing it, ask: What is this posture solving for? LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies at https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium
    Voir plus Voir moins
    37 min
  • RECONsider... Stretch and Strengthen with Bill Hartman | Episode #64

    RECONsider... Stretch and Strengthen with Bill Hartman | Episode #64
    Jun 1 2025
    Learn More From Bill Live on the UHP network http://UHP.network Episode Overview Chris and Bill critically examine the traditional “stretch what’s tight, strengthen what’s weak” model in movement and rehabilitation. They explore how this reductionist approach oversimplifies the complexity of human movement by focusing on isolated muscles rather than systemic behavior. The conversation highlights the limitations of applying neuromuscular theories like reciprocal inhibition in isolation and contrasts these with a more holistic, systems-based perspective—emphasizing that movement and pain are emergent outcomes of interacting forces, body shape changes, and compensatory strategies. The episode is rich with clinical reasoning, practical analogies, and real-world examples to illustrate why the traditional model often fails, especially with complex cases. #movement #fitness #stretching #physicaltherapy #health Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – Introduction The hosts introduce the topic by discussing the widespread belief that movement problems can be solved by stretching tight muscles and strengthening weak ones. They question the validity of this approach and trace its origins to oversimplified interpretations of neuromuscular science. 03:12 – Critique of Reductionism Chris and Bill discuss how the popularity of the reductionist approach stems from its ease of teaching and comfort for both practitioners and clients. However, they argue that this view fails to reflect the true complexity of human movement, where muscles and connective tissues act as a system. 08:40 – Historical Context and Systemic Thinking They review historical influences, such as PNF (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) and osteopathic models, which originally emphasized systemic behavior and movement patterns but have since been reduced to isolated techniques. 12:30 – The Reality of Stretching and Strengthening The hosts explore what actually happens during stretching and strengthening, noting that sensations of tightness are often related to connective tissue tension and body position rather than muscle length. They challenge the idea that stretching makes muscles longer and discuss the potential risks of overstretching. 18:20 – Bone and Connective Tissue Adaptation Chris and Bill explain that extreme flexibility in athletes is often due to bony and connective tissue adaptations, not just muscle lengthening. They use analogies like twisting a towel to illustrate how skeletal changes can affect perceived tightness. 23:50 – Strengthening and Movement Behavior The conversation shifts to strengthening, noting that perceived muscle weakness is often a result of body position and systemic constraints rather than isolated muscle deficits. The hosts emphasize that restoring movement options and body shape is more important than targeting individual muscles. 30:00 – Case Examples and Clinical Reasoning Practical scenarios—such as hip flexor stretches and glute activation exercises—are discussed to illustrate how traditional interventions may provide temporary relief but fail to address underlying systemic issues. The hosts explain why some interventions work in some contexts but not others. 40:15 – Signal vs. Noise in Intervention Chris and Bill highlight the importance of reproducible, lasting changes versus temporary symptomatic relief. They encourage practitioners to look for systemic patterns and to avoid over-relying on isolated techniques. 45:20 – The Bigger Picture: Adaptability and Constraints The episode concludes by emphasizing that movement is always a systemic, emergent behavior shaped by internal and external constraints. The hosts stress that adaptations are context-dependent solutions, not inherently dysfunctional, and that effective intervention requires understanding the whole system. Key Takeaways Movement and pain are systemic, emergent behaviors shaped by interacting forces and body shape changes, not just isolated muscle function. The “stretch what’s tight, strengthen what’s weak” model is an oversimplification that often fails, especially with complex cases. Sensations of tightness and weakness are often related to body position and systemic constraints, not just muscle length or strength. Extreme flexibility and perceived muscle tightness can result from bony and connective tissue adaptations, not just muscle behavior. Effective intervention requires restoring movement options and body shape, not just targeting individual muscles. Temporary symptomatic relief is not the same as lasting, systemic change; practitioners should look for reproducible, context-dependent improvements. Understanding movement as a complex, adaptive system is essential for effective clinical reasoning and improved client outcomes.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    49 min
  • RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63

    RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63
    May 18 2025
    Free articles and courses about movement from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode 63 Overview Chris and Bill critically examine traditional motor control models in movement science, contrasting them with the Unified Health and Performance Continuum (UHPC) model. Their discussion challenges reductionist, brain-centric explanations of movement, advocating instead for an emergent, systems-based perspective that emphasizes adaptability, energy flow, and problem-solving in human movement. The episode is rich with practical analogies, clinical reasoning, and real-world examples to illustrate the limitations of conventional approaches and the strengths of the UHPC framework. Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – Introduction The hosts set the stage by questioning the dominance of motor control theories that focus on isolated muscles and sequencing, noting how such approaches oversimplify the complexity of human movement. 01:14 – Critique of Reductionism Chris and Bill discuss how the popularity of brain-as-master-controller models stems from their simplicity and ease of teaching, but argue that this view fails to reflect the true complexity of movement systems. 08:24 – Emergence and Complexity They introduce the concept of movement as an emergent property, referencing Bernstein’s “repetition without repetition” to highlight that no two movements are ever exactly the same. Variability within a healthy range is seen as a sign of robustness, not error. 13:47 – Energy Flow and Gradients The conversation shifts to energy dynamics, with Bill using analogies of fluid flow and gradients to explain how movement is shaped by pressure and energy distribution, not just neural commands. 16:46 – Adaptation as Solution, Not Dysfunction Structural changes like twists or shifts in joints are reframed as adaptive solutions to constraints, rather than failures or dysfunctions. The hosts stress that what appears as “static posture” is actually a constrained, active solution to ongoing physiological challenges. 18:19 – Integrating Tools, Rethinking Reasoning While traditional exercises and techniques aren’t dismissed, Chris and Bill argue that the rationale behind their use matters. The UHPC model seeks to expand movement options and adaptability, rather than just “correcting” isolated problems. 20:47 – Continuum of Health and Performance The hosts explain that health and performance exist on a continuum, often with trade-offs. Optimal performance may require narrowing adaptability, which can increase fragility and risk. 24:10 – Case Example: Knee Pain A practical scenario illustrates how the UHPC model differs from traditional approaches. Instead of focusing on isolated muscle activation, the model looks at how energy is distributed through the system, using observation and experimentation to guide interventions. 32:12 – Observation and Iteration The importance of direct observation and questioning is emphasized. Rather than defaulting to “what can I stretch or strengthen?”, practitioners are encouraged to watch movement in context and look for systemic patterns. 33:53 – Systemic vs. Isolated Solutions The episode concludes by reinforcing that movement is always systemic and emergent, not simply a matter of parts or levers. Adaptations are always solutions to constraints, even if they’re not always optimal. Key Takeaways The UHPC model views movement as an emergent, adaptive behavior shaped by energy flow, constraints, and systemic problem-solving-not just neural control or isolated muscle activation. Variability and adaptability are hallmarks of healthy movement; reductionist models that seek to eliminate variation can increase fragility. Practitioners should focus on expanding movement options and adaptability, using observation, questioning, and experimentation rather than rigid protocols. Structural adaptations are context-dependent solutions, not inherently dysfunctional. Effective clinical reasoning requires moving beyond static anatomical models and embracing complexity, energy dynamics, and the continuum between health and performance. Communication, curiosity, and willingness to question established paradigms are essential for practitioner growth and improved client outcomes. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? https://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium
    Voir plus Voir moins
    36 min
  • RECONsider... Chat GPT vs Bill's Model | Episode #62

    RECONsider... Chat GPT vs Bill's Model | Episode #62
    May 4 2025
    Free articles and courses about ISA from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode Summary: In this episode, Chris and Bill explore the philosophical and practical foundations of the UHPC model, breaking down how it operates as a model, framework, and lens for clinical reasoning and movement assessment. They discuss the challenge of maintaining objectivity when a model seems universally effective, the interplay between complexity and probability in clinical decision-making, and the ongoing evolution of their approach through questioning and iteration. The conversation is guided by AI-generated questions, prompting candid discussion on adaptation, structural change, practitioner bias, and the importance of communication and emotional intelligence in practice. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction and AI-Generated Questions 01:14 – Model, Framework, and Lens: Definitions They clarify the differences and overlaps between a model (the all-encompassing system), a framework (the structural process within the model), and a lens (the practitioner’s perspective in context). 03:28 – Principles, Process, and Practices Discussion of how principles, process, and practices fit within the model, and the importance of moving from big-picture concepts to practical application. 06:20 – Complexity, Probability, and Clinical Decision-Making Bill explains how outcomes in complex systems are emergent, requiring practitioners to intervene, observe, and iterate based on behavioral outcomes. 08:01 – Structural Change vs. Compensation They explore how adaptations like bone torsions or pelvic shifts are solutions to constraints, not failures, and when such changes are reversible or permanent. 12:13 – Testing, Falsification, and Principles Chris and Bill discuss the ongoing process of testing and retesting the model’s foundational principles, the role of heuristics, and the importance of probabilistic outcomes over certainty. 15:46 – Evolution of the Model and Embracing Failure A candid look at how the model has evolved through failure, discovery, and reframing, including shifts in how movement is described and assessed. 19:23 – Measurement, Quantum Concepts, and Practitioner Bias Bill relates measurement in movement to quantum principles, discussing how the act of measurement collapses possibilities into observable outcomes, and why practitioner bias is inevitable but manageable. 22:38 – Handling Clinical Challenges and Uncertainty They address how practitioners can confront tough cases and learn from them, or avoid growth by sticking to what’s comfortable, emphasizing accountability and curiosity. 25:18 – Abductive Reasoning and Practitioner Improvisation Discussion of how abductive reasoning underpins all clinical choices, especially in the face of incomplete information, and how intuition and safe-to-fail experiments play a role. 27:55 – Emergent Failure, Communication, and the Human Element The importance of psychosocial factors, communication, and emotional intelligence in clinical outcomes, and how these interact with technical aspects of the model. 32:43 – Tracking Systemic Drift and Redirecting Adaptation Bill walks through a real-world case of tracking “systemic drift” in a basketball player, using movement and behavioral cues to intervene before maladaptive patterns become entrenched. Key Takeaways: The UHPC model is dynamic, functioning as a model, framework, and lens depending on context and scale. Clinical decision-making in complex systems is inherently probabilistic and iterative; outcomes emerge through intervention and observation. Structural adaptations are not failures but solutions to constraints; some are reversible, others are not. The model evolves through constant questioning, failure, and willingness to reframe assumptions. Communication skills and emotional intelligence are critical components of effective practice, even if not explicitly taught within the model. Practitioners must embrace uncertainty, use abductive reasoning, and be willing to experiment and learn from both success and failure. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com Podbaudio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202...
    Voir plus Voir moins
    38 min
  • RECONsider... Infrasternal Angle Explained and Applied with Bill Hartman | Episode #61

    RECONsider... Infrasternal Angle Explained and Applied with Bill Hartman | Episode #61
    Apr 20 2025
    Free articles and courses about ISA from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Try Bill’s training program based on YOUR ISA at http://www.reconu.co Episode Summary: In this episode, Chris and Bill continue their discussion on the Infra-Sternal Angle (ISA), diving deeper into how to identify and assess it, the implications of narrow vs. wide archetypes, and how this understanding can guide more individualized movement and training strategies. They demystify common misconceptions, clarify measurement expectations, and highlight how structural biases affect both breathing and performance potential. Chapters: 00:00 – Introduction to the ISA Discussion 01:14 – Clarifying Archetype Confusion They discuss the confusion many people have around their own classification noting how perceptions, measurements, and inconsistent cues can cloud understanding. 01:59 – The Helical Nature of the ISA Bill explains that the ISA is helical He dismisses simplistic goniometric measurements in favor of observing breathing and movement behavior patterns. 04:30 – Biases of Wide vs. Narrow Archetypes The duo explains that wide archetypes are structurally biased toward external rotation and struggle to compress, while narrow archetypes are biased toward internal rotation and have difficulty expanding. 05:19 – Measuring the ISA: Article and Video Resource Chris mentions an upcoming article and video demonstration from Bill on the UHPC network, aimed at helping viewers understand and measure the ISA more effectively. 06:13 – Hands-On Expectations with Narrows Bill walks through what one should expect when measuring a narrow ISA—minimal outward rib movement during inhalation, with little external rotation visible. 08:40 – Hands-On Expectations with Wides For wide ISAs, the ribs are more externally rotated at baseline, with limited ability to compress inward. Bill notes that wides start with hands farther apart, and don't move closer together easily during breathing. 10:39 – Assessing Intervention Impact on Relative Motion They discuss how improvements in movement capacity post-intervention can be observed through increased rib cage excursion—especially in narrows gaining more expansion ability. 12:23 – Limitations of Clinical Populations Chris notes that most clinicians are dealing with compensatory, not ideal, movement archetypes, which distorts perception of archetypal norms. 13:36 – Table Measure Differences in Narrows and Wides Bill describes how narrows typically show greater external rotation and limited internal rotation, while wides present the opposite—again emphasizing these as structural biases, not dysfunctions. 17:12 – Training Considerations by Archetype They shift into applying this knowledge to training choices. Interventions should account for each archetype’s structural bias to prevent loss of relative motion and capacity. 18:37 – Training Risks for Narrows Bill warns that narrows do poorly with heavy deadlifts and compressive strategies that reduce their ability to expand, even if they can still get stronger. 20:20 – Training Risks for Wides Wides, being naturally force-oriented, may lose external rotation and movement variability if driven too far into compressive strength training patterns. 21:50 – Compression vs. Expansion in Both Archetypes Bill outlines how both archetypes deal with compression and expansion, just in different orientations—toward or away from the body’s long axis. 23:03 – Episode Wrap-Up and ISA Takeaways Key Takeaways: ISA is a Helical Concept: Not a flat-plane angle, and shouldn't be oversimplified. Structural Biases Matter: Narrows compress well and struggle to expand; wides expand easily but struggle to compress. Movement Assessment Requires Nuance: Table measures should be understood through the lens of structural archetypes. Training Should Be Archetype-Specific: Optimizing performance and minimizing compensation starts with matching intervention to structure. Avoid Overcompensation: Excessive training that aligns too strongly with a person’s structural bias can reduce variability and create new limitations. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies at https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/
    Voir plus Voir moins
    25 min
  • RECONSIDER... The Ultimate Guide to ISA (Infrasternal Angle) | Episode #60

    RECONSIDER... The Ultimate Guide to ISA (Infrasternal Angle) | Episode #60
    Apr 6 2025
    Free articles and courses about ISA from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Try Bill’s training program based on YOUR ISA at http://www.reconu.co Episode Summary: In this episode, Chris and Bill explore the concept of the Infra-Sternal Angle (ISA), discussing its definition, historical context, and implications for movement and performance. They delve into how the ISA relates to structural archetypes, specifically the narrow and wide types, and how these archetypes influence breathing, movement, and athletic performance. #isa #physicaltherapy #stretching #mobility #biomechanics Chapters & Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction to the Infra-Sternal Angle Chris and Bill introduce the ISA, clarifying its origins and common misconceptions about its attribution. 00:41 – Historical Context and Early Exposure Bill discusses his first exposure to the ISA, referencing Shirley Sarman's work and older anatomical studies. 04:26 – Defining the Infra-Sternal Angle Chris and Bill define the ISA as the angle formed by the lower rib cage below the sternum, emphasizing its importance in structural analysis. 08:27 – Structural Archetypes: Narrow and Wide They discuss how the ISA relates to two primary structural archetypes: the narrow and the wide, each with distinct movement biases. 09:02 – Movement and Breathing Biases Bill explains how narrow archetypes are biased towards inhalation and external rotation, while wide archetypes are biased towards exhalation and internal rotation. 15:00 – Performance Implications Chris and Bill explore how these biases affect athletic performance, with narrow archetypes excelling in high-velocity turning and wide archetypes in force production. 23:05 – Wide Structural Archetype Capabilities They discuss the wide archetype's ability to generate force and support weight due to a broader base of support. 25:29 – Force vs. Velocity Chris and Bill clarify that force and velocity are opposites, with narrow archetypes favoring velocity and wide archetypes favoring force. 27:02 – Conclusion They summarize the ISA's role in understanding structural archetypes and their implications for movement and performance. Key Takeaways: Understanding Structural Archetypes: Recognize the narrow and wide archetypes and their implications for movement. Breathing and Movement Biases: Each archetype has specific breathing and movement biases that influence performance. Performance Optimization: Tailor training strategies to the individual's structural archetype for optimal performance. Force vs. Velocity: Understand that force and velocity are distinct, with different archetypes excelling in each area. Books Mentioned in the Episode: Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes: https://amzn.to/44b57oM LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network FOLLOW Bill on IG to stay up to date on when his courses are coming out: IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? Join the rapidly growing community who are reconstructing their bodies at https://www.reconu.co FREE EBOOK by Bill about the guiding principles of training when you fill out your sign-up form. http://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium
    Voir plus Voir moins
    28 min